Home / Featured / Houghton Planning Commission okays rezoning of west Houghton parcel
Frank A. Douglass Insurance Agency

Houghton Planning Commission okays rezoning of west Houghton parcel

A contentious rezoning issue was wrapped up by the Houghton Planning Commission Tuesday night. Up for debate was whether to reclassify roughly 15 acres that was annexed by the City of Houghton in 2008 from single family residential to allow for potential business development. The site, near Coles Creek, is a superfund site and many neighbors, of which all live in Stanton Township, are worried about the potential environmental effects from building out for commercial activity. They have proposed that only single family residential uses be permitted. The public comment session featured many speakers who were against the request.

Attorney Matt Eliason questioned whether commercial development is actually more risky.

The reality is that residential carries a lot higher social and danger of burden than it would for an industrial property. The idea that digging it up is gonna happen and there will be steam shovels digging it up is pure speculation.

He said that while the property is currently zoned residential, all past plans for a subdivision there have fallen through. For all intents and purposes, it has been commercial for the past 150 years.

Chairman Tom Merz said the issue boiled down to how much input other municipalities and their residents should have on zoning issues within the City of Houghton. 

When Hancock built the Ramada Inn, I don’t remember them asking me. I don’t remember them asking the City of Houghton. So I think there are limits to when we talk about being good neighbors. Where do we draw the boundaries? Where do we stop?

Merz said he was sympathetic to the viewpoint that others would be harmed if there were negative consequences for water quality related to construction on the parcel. However, he said that responsibility fell to other state regulatory agencies to monitor and was outside the purview of the Planning Commission.

The measure passed unanimously with one abstention. Member Mike Needham sits on both the Planning Commission and the City Council, but can only cast a vote with one body. He decided to weigh in on the subject after a public hearing at a future council meeting instead.

Correction: This story originally identified Matt Eliason as a member of the commission. He is an attorney and spoke to the commission after public comment had concluded.

Check Also

The Upper Peninsula Environmental Coalition requests proposals for two 2025 grant programs

The Upper Peninsula Environmental Coalition announces its 2025 round of Community Conversation Grants and Environmental …