Home / News / Local News / Dianda Votes Against House-Passed Energy Reform Plan
Frank A. Douglass Insurance Agency

Dianda Votes Against House-Passed Energy Reform Plan

The Michigan House has approved a rewrite of state energy laws on the final day of voting during the two-year term.

The Republican-led chamber voted on Thursday to boost the required use of renewable sources of power and to keep intact some competition in the electricity market.

Thursday was the final day of the two-year term.

The bills, which passed 79-28 and 76-31, were sent to the Senate for final votes after days of wrangling.

State Representative Scott Dianda was not among those supporting the legislation.  His office released the following statement:

Dianda Votes No on Energy Plan

Lawmaker says bills wouldn’t lower rates for U.P. families

LANSING – State Rep. Scott Dianda (D-Calumet) voted no today on an energy plan Gov. Rick Snyder and supporters were trying to push through the Legislature on the last day of the 2015-16 legislative session. Senate Bills 437 and 438 eventually passed with Dianda voting no because the plan does not help U.P. families with their extremely high utility bills, nor does it address the unique energy needs of U.P. communities.

“As we’re debating these energy bills in Lansing, my constituents are in the middle of the first real blizzard of the season, and they’re hoping that the power stays on, their homes stay warm and they can afford to pay their next energy bill,” said Dianda. “The bills that passed here today, however, don’t do anything to lower energy bills for U.P. families who pay some of the highest energy bills in the state, and that’s why I voted no.”

Dianda tried to improve Senate Bills 437 and 438 by offering amendments that would have expanded net metering allowing more residents to produce their own power, as well as increasing competition and choice to help residents find the most affordable power, and increasing transparency in rate cases by having the Michigan Public Service Commission hold rate case hearings in the U.P. service territory when a U.P. energy company asks for a rate change.

“Energy costs and energy choice are critically important for my residents, and here we are trying to move 200-plus-page bills through the House without even a committee hearing,” said Dianda. “Michigan needs an energy plan, and the U.P. needs an energy plan, but it’s hard to get that in the last 24-48 hours of session. Energy is an important issue, and we need to give it the time it deserves to get it right for my U.P. residents as well as the rest of Michigan.”

Check Also

The Upper Peninsula Environmental Coalition requests proposals for two 2025 grant programs

The Upper Peninsula Environmental Coalition announces its 2025 round of Community Conversation Grants and Environmental …